Oceanside, Nevada

Real life in an imaginary place.

Oceanside, Nevada header image 4

One of those days.

January 28th, 2008 by Wood
Respond

It’s a downright yucky day here in Oceanside, Nevada. Cold, wet, and dark, with occasional hail. It’s one of those days when you don’t want to do anything work-wise. I managed to see a couple of clients but my heart was totally not in it. In fact, I managed to spend half an hour in the parking lot of my second client wasting time on Twitter, Jott and Sandy.

Which brings me back to my iPhone todo rant. I’ve been trying to find a simple solution to Esme’s lack of a todo and/or notes app and I gotta tell you, I’m just not finding it. Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot of fine apps out there. So far I’ve tried Jott, ReQall, Remember the Milk, TaDa Lists, Stikkit and now Sandy and they’re all interesting and seem to do an adequate job but they’re just one more layer of abstraction.

If all I had was a plain old ordinary cell phone, any of these would work just fine, since I really couldn’t hope for any better, right? But what happens when I’m out of coverage—which happens more than you’d think, even in this day and age—and, call me impatient, but dealing with web apps is just tedious sometimes. Edge is pretty good, and WiFi is awesome, but they’re still not as fast as a native app would be and they add unnecessary complexity.

I’ve said it before but I want tasks with alarms, notes with PDF, rich text and links and an easy way to track my mileage for taxes. That’s all. These three simple things would be way more useful to me than any faux GPS or wiggling icon doohickey. When the SDK ships, I’m obviously going to have to either learn to code or kidnap a programmer and force him to do my bidding:

“Oh god, what do you want?”

“It codes the todo widget! THEN it rubs the lotion on it’s skin!

In other news, I think I’m going to take the plunge and migrate the blog thingy to WordPress. I’ve been pretty happy with BlogHarbor but there is a certain undeniable appeal behind the idea of all those lovely, lovely WordPress plugins. PressHarbor is WordPress hosting from the same folks who do BlogHarbor, so I figure to expect a pretty quality set up with minimal geekiness required from yours truly. I don’t really know what to expect, though I imagine plenty of stuff will break. Just be warned.

Tags: Comments Off

Best. Disclaimer. EVER.

January 5th, 2008 by Wood
Respond

They’re not responsible. I bet they still get sued.

Thanks, Rachie!

Tags: Comments Off

As if there were any doubt.

December 30th, 2007 by Wood
Respond

Take the Sci fi sounds quiz I received 85 credits on
The Sci Fi Sounds Quiz

How much of a Sci-Fi geek are you?
Take the Sci-Fi Movie Quiz canon s5

My weakest link is movies from the fifties, I’m afraid.

Tags: Comments Off

Sometimes you just wanna smack someone.

December 25th, 2007 by Wood
Respond

Argh!

iPhones don’t do MMS. I don’t know why, they just don’t. That means that if you like to take pictures with your cellphone and send them to someone with an iPhone, they won’t get it, no matter how many times you resend it. What you will get (at least on AT&T, for you non-unlockers like moi) is a text message telling you to go to viewmymessage.com with instructions to put in such and such message ID and such and such password to view your message.

Which would be fine except for the fact that it never works. I think I’ve successfully looked at an MMS message through viewmymessage.com maybe twice. The rest of the time it fails with a nonspecific error message and an exhortation to “try again later.”

Do you have any idea what it’s like to have someone send you an MMS only to tell them you can’t view it WITH AN IPHONE?! I mean, come ON. The cheapest goddamn camera phone that you can get for free with any carrier will do MMS but not the fucking Jesus Phone? Are you frigging kidding me?

Yes, I know that I can send picture messages with email. Email to MMS gateways are rather flaky in my experience. I’ve never succeeded in sending a picture to someone’s phone that way. Pictures to someone’s email, sure. Phone? Never. As for getting my friends and family to email me their camera pictures vs. MMS let me just ask you this: how many of your friends who aren’t using smartphones know how to use them for email, even if it’s possible? Hell, two of the people I know actually using smartphones can’t do email!

I don’t use MMS all that much, I’ll admit, but I have used it in the past and I’ll bet that if my iPhone could do MMS, I’d use it in the future. What possible reason is there for leaving this feature out? I can’t figure it out.

MacWorld can’t get here soon enough. I really hope we see a major iPhone update.

Tags: Comments Off

That’s one jumbo sized can o’ crazy you got there, Kenny.

December 19th, 2007 by Wood
Respond

Jesus’ General runs down some of Ken Hovind’s greatest hits.

Anyone who can say with a straight face that America can maintain world leadership with this kind of insanity being promulgated to children is simply deluded. It’s really, really simple: economic growth is a function of technological progress. If we want to grow our economy, we have make new things. Technology is the practical application of science. Turn your back on science, pretty soon you’re buying your technology from someone else. They grow, you don’t.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tags: Comments Off

Oh yeah. This is gonna go great.

December 19th, 2007 by Wood
Respond

Someone out there, please help me with this because… uh… I just don’t get it.

You may recall that NBC and Apple had a bit of a disagreement recently on content recently. NBC said that Apple wasn’t being fair about pricing. Apple said that NBC wanted touch consumers in their swimsuit place and make them pay for the privilege. As I recall, one of the ideas NBC was pursuing was “bundling” a successful show with a piece of crap that NBC can’t get people to watch for free, kind of like those “two great movies!” deals you find at Costco that’s almost invariably a classic shrink-wrapped to something idiots wouldn’t hang from their rear-view mirror to get that way cool blinding rainbow effect. I think I might have read somewhere about NBC asking for stricter DRM as well.

At any rate, a deal was decidedly not reached and (depending on who you hear it from), NBC either took it’s ball and went home or Apple tried to jam a doorknob up NBC’s ass on their way out. Keep in mind here: there is nowhere, let me repeat that: NOWHERE on the Internet where you can purchase television programs the day after they air. Never mind the video quality, never mind the lack of commercials. If you want to own it, put it on your personal media player to watch on the bus, stream it to your television, whatever, you have exactly two choices: iTunes and bittorrent.

Aside: yes, I know you can buy DVD’s and rip them and I understand that there are multiple ways to capture video to your PC or Mac. I’m speaking to that group of people who lack the savvy, the patience, or who don’t like stealing. Personally, I’m in the last two categories.

So you have your two choices: iTunes and bittorrent. One makes money, the other doesn’t. Sure, maybe NBC doesn’t make as much money as they’d like from iTunes, but the last time I checked, something was better than nothing. So, what do you think NBC did about that? They created Hulu (Now there’s a descriptive name! Really tells you what it’s all about, doesn’t it? They could have just as easily called it Bingely Bongely, or Framzamr! Because dropping the e before the r and exclamation points is totally web 2.0) which, as far as I can tell, pretty much tries to repeat the whole television experiment on your computer.

That’s right, you get commercials! And because everyone longs for the days when a 19 inch television was freaking huge, you get to watch in a tiny window in your browser. You don’t need to worry about complicated things like iPods, you can’t download the video anyway (Yet. More on that thought in a minute). Oh, you were going to spend a week with the in-laws in Buttfuck, Minnesota? Wow, bummer dude. Hope you like playing backgammon with your father-in-law because if they don’t have a pretty hefty pipe to the Internet you ain’t hiding in the guest room watching any fucking Jack Bauer or Peter Griffin, okay?

But it’s free! Totally free! That is, if you can get in on the closed beta (also totally web 2.0). Or, then again, you could just traipse on over to OpenHulu, and watch a bunch of Hulu content for, uh, nothing. Because in keeping with this web 2.0 thingy, NBC wants you to imbed Hulu content so people can share stuff (that’s the most web 2.0 thing of all!). So a person could conceivably completely avoid Hulu’s web site entirely. Now I always kind of thought that one of the central ideas of web commerce was to get people to actually, you know, go to your web site but I’m just some blogger. What do I know?

But here’s where I start to really lose the trail on this: there are any number of apps and applets out there that make it trivially easy to download embedded media. Last time I looked there were at least four or five Firefox extensions alone specifically for this. Some of the better ones will even transcode the media into whatever you want to watch, or transfer, or archive or share. How long before someone figures out how to do that for Hulu video? It plays in a regular web browser, not a dedicated client, (at least the shared embedded video does, I don’t actually know how Hulu proper does it) so someone out there’s got to be smart enough to intercept the stream. I’m guessing it’s got some form of DRM and everybody knows how totally rock solid infallible that shit is.

My guess is that by the time Hulu is open to the public there will be a small handful of ways to automatically grab and transcode the video. Though why you would is a good question. I mean, if you’re going to steal media (can you steal something that someone is basically giving away?) you may as well take the extra step and steal the HD version via bittorrent. I’m not advocating that, mind, but as far as I can tell, NBC hasn’t left people who actually want to pay for content any way to actually do so.

So in a nutshell: NBC wanted more money. Because they couldn’t peddle crazy-ass schemes to Apple to get more money they pulled all their content from the only place on the Intarweb where people have demonstrated a desire to actually pay for shit they could almost just as easily steal. And just to show that meanie Steve Jobs, they started up their own video store where they could pursue all their crazy ideas and show him who’s boss. No, wait, that would actually make sense. No, they came up with a plan to, you know, like, uh, give it away. With… ads.

Is there something I’m not seeing here? Because to me, it looks like the Emperor ain’t just naked, he’s also about as bright as the inside of boot.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Tags: Comments Off

Pole Dancing on the Subway.

December 16th, 2007 by Wood
Respond

Best example I’ve ever seen of sexy without naked. Via Burlesque Baby Blog

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Tags: 1 Comment

In which I reveal my innermost dork…

November 24th, 2007 by Wood
Respond

Okay, so it’s no secret by now that J.J. Abrams is doing the next Star Trek film. It’s also known to be kind of a prequel that attempts to re-boot the series. As an old school Star Trek nerd (Kirk totally kicks Picard’s ass. Sorry, but it’s true. On the other hand, Picard doesn’t start an interstellar war by accidentally shtupping the alien warlord’s favorite concubine), I’m mildly excited about this. I figure Paramount has gone to some pretty extreme lengths to ruin the franchise so, at the least, it will be interesting to see how Abrams digs his way out.

The casting was announced some time ago and this is actually the reason I’m writing. If you haven’t heard, iFilm runs down the list right here.

Chris Pine will be sitting in the captain’s chair. I’ve never seen him act, but he resembles Shatner enough to get the preliminary nod. Zachary Quinto as Spock is dream casting, pure and simple. He’s got the look and he can do emotional detachment like nobody’s business. John Cho as Sulu? Like Pine, he’s got the look. Gotta see if he can pull off the rest. Which brings us to Simon Pegg as Scotty.

Cue unexpected record scratch.

What? Are you kidding me? I mean, don’t get me wrong, I’m definitely a Simon Pegg fan but he’s about as appropriate for the role as Dame Judi Dench. He doesn’t have the look, maybe he can do the accent, I don’t know. My big fear is that Scotty will be played strictly for laughs.

For a while there, there was a rumor floating around that Paul McGillion (Stargate: Atlantis’ Dr. Carson Beckett) was being considered for the role. This made me happy. McGillion has the look, he can definitely do the accent (McGillion was born in Scotland and emigrated to Canada with his family at the age of two) and he has the support of the late James Doohan’s family. Alas it was not to be.

At any rate, my enthusiasm for the flick has cooled a bit. At least we’ve got Cloverfield to look forward to.

Tags: Comments Off

Happy Thanksgiving.

November 22nd, 2007 by Wood
Respond

“You wanna end the war, don’t you? I’ve been singing this song for 25 minutes and I can go for another 25 minutes.

I’m not proud.

Or tired.”

It’s that time of year again, when all the good little boys and children gather around to hear the story of the Alice’s Restaurant Massacree in full four part harmony. Complete with glossy pictures with circles and arrows and descriptions on the back of each one.

Kid, I said, kid, it’s just not Thanksgiving without it.

Tags: Comments Off

Happy Tuesday, kids.

November 20th, 2007 by Wood
Respond

I have a couple of observations I’ve made recently that I would like to share with you all. Sort of a project of collective wisdom, if you will.

First of all, the best time to find out your brand new brine tank has a hole in it is some time prior to putting 300 pounds of salt in it.

Check valves are a good thing, especially when they’re installed respective to the direction of flow in a pipe.

Ball valves, gate valve, globe valves (the key word here is valves) are digital devices. No, really. Valves are intended to be on or off and that’s it, there is no in between. If you have (or think you have) an application that requires throttling, get a throttling valve. They’re analog.

And finally, when you ask a chief engineer where his condensate receiver is so you can get sample for testing and he responds “I don’t know what that is,” you would do well to acquaint yourself with the emergency exits because that’s a building destined to blow up some day.


Tags: Comments Off